|
PROBLEMS IN PARADISE By Heather Anderson It is the beginning of the twentieth century. The Amazon rain forest is largely undisturbed and unaltered. Few settlers have penetrated into its moist, green interior. The Amazon River flows, fresh, and clean, through this astounding ecosystem. Fast-forward 100 years. Though the Amazon River
still runs through the rainforest it is polluted due to mercury poisoning.
Much of the forest has been destroyed thanks to farmers, loggers, miners
and cattle ranchers. At the center of the destruction is the Brazilian
government, who allows the devastation and illegal activities to continue.
They see the Amazon as a challenge that must be conquered, rather than
what it is, a gift that should be used to the advantage of the Brazilian
people. The Brazilian government does not seem to care about this wonder
that has an effect on the entire planet. They have shown, time and time
again, that they arent capable of keeping their citizens under
control and punishing those who break conservation laws. Should this
group of people have control over the Amazon simply because it is within
their borders? I dont think so. They give little thought to the
global consequences of their actions and this carelessness may be fatal
to our planet. If a powerful global organization was given control of
the Amazon, the forest could be stabilized over time. The countries
that have the rainforest within their borders could be shown how to
successfully and profitably harvest the rainforest. This way its existence
would be ensured for many generations. Action must be taken and taken
now, for there may not be a tomorrow. But who could possibly take
on such a responsibility? In the last few months we have seen the UN
pushed to the side and disregarded by the most powerful countries in
the world, its influence and approval weightless. Who is to say
that Brazil wont do the same thing, or that whatever the UN says
will really be taken into account. Environmental groups such as Greenpeace,
the Nature Conservancy, or Conservation International, have the right
thing at heart, protecting the rain forest and the creatures that live
there. However, are they able to tell the Brazilian government that
they no longer have control over their own land? This is unlikely, unless
they have someone behind them that can force the government to oblige.
Unfortunately, any country that has control over the rainforest, either
directly or indirectly, faces the threat of global disapproval. And
then theres always a chance that the country backing the plan
could also abuse the rainforest. Looking at the way our world is setup
today, the best way to go about protecting the rainforest would be to
have a nonprofit organization with a reputable history, that has a positive,
but not radical, environmental focus directly take control of the Amazon.
This group should be backed by several countries that have influence
and power. These countries would have to do little other than the initial
setup, and the occasionally check in to be sure everything is moving
forward. But does such a combination exist? Unfortunately theres
more to fixing the problem than restoring peace and order to the jungle.
The underlying problems in Brazil and other South American countries
need to be looked at and possible solutions need to be examined. The
rainforest is being turned into farmland due the migration of poor,
landless farmers in the south to the Amazon rainforest in the north.
Roads, built with money from the world banks, give these people easy
access to the north, where they farm for a few years and then move on.
Then come the cattle ranchers who make more money by owning the land
than raising cattle. In other places, the rainforest is destroyed for
mining. Brazil has one of the best deposits of iron ore in the world.
A large amount of Japan and Europes iron comes from these deposits.
Brazil now has such a large debt from developing the rainforest that
it seems as though it will never be paid off. Theres more to the
problem than meets the eye and if it is not fixed, we will never be
guaranteed that the rainforest will be safe in the future. Throughout history, man
has altered his surroundings in many ways, sometimes working against
nature, other times with it. Countries like India, Indonesia, Congo
(Democratic Republic), and Malaysia, used to be covered in rain forest,
similar to Brazil and the Amazon. Today however, there is little rain
forest left in these countries. What is still standing is rapidly declining.
These countries are not industrial countries. Over population, poverty,
terrorism and health problems plague them to such an extent that there
seems to be no solution. Could this be Brazils future if it does
not act? Possibly. The destruction of the rain forest affects rainfall
and drought. Any area cleared will fall into a drought. Brazil does
not have enough money to import food and if its population continues
to grow, it could soon be facing a large famine. This creates a breeding
ground for civil unrest, political extremists and revolution. If the
Brazilian government does not stop it, they could be overthrown. If
they use extreme force, not only are they looked down upon by other
countries and threatened with sanctions, but their own people will have
distrust and hate for them as well. So what does the Brazilian government
have to gain by cutting down the rainforest? Not much. In the event that nothing
is done to save the Amazon, it will be gone in a matter of decades.
Rainforest cover 6% of the earths land surface. Fifty years ago
it covered 14%. Scientists estimate that it may disappear as soon as
2040. If the Amazon is destroyed, the whole of northern Brazil, southern
sections of French Guiana, Surinam, Guyana, and parts of Venezuela,
Ecuador, Peru, and Bolivia will become barren lands, scarcely capable
of supporting even the feeblest of vegetation. Eventually it will become
a desert. This is already happening in the areas that have been deforested,
and will continue to happen if the deforestation is not stopped. We must take steps to protect
the rainforest because it is a natural wonder and a fundamental key
to the survival of Earth. It supplies about an estimated 20% of the
earths oxygen and cuts down on gas emissions. |